<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 437 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174948</link>
    <description>A post-confirmation petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 may be disposed of without an oral hearing unless the statute or rules expressly, or by necessary implication, require one. In a special statutory scheme governing disciplined armed forces, the content of natural justice depends on the enactment, the nature of the power, and its purpose. The BSF Act and the relevant rules contained no provision mandating a personal hearing before disposal of such a petition, and the Court treated earlier Army Act authorities as supporting that position. The High Court&#039;s direction for a fresh hearing was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 437 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174948</link>
      <description>A post-confirmation petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 may be disposed of without an oral hearing unless the statute or rules expressly, or by necessary implication, require one. In a special statutory scheme governing disciplined armed forces, the content of natural justice depends on the enactment, the nature of the power, and its purpose. The BSF Act and the relevant rules contained no provision mandating a personal hearing before disposal of such a petition, and the Court treated earlier Army Act authorities as supporting that position. The High Court&#039;s direction for a fresh hearing was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>