https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=932 The Tribunal upheld the order confirming duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalties imposed on a company and its manager for the clandestine removal of excisable goods without paying Central Excise duty. The manager's involvement was established, justifying the penalties despite arguments against penalty imposition due to duty payment before notice and based on a precedent. The provisional release of goods with fines in lieu of confiscation was upheld to maintain procedural integrity, leading to the rejection of the appeals and affirmation of the original order. en-us Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=932 The Tribunal upheld the order confirming duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalties imposed on a company and its manager for the clandestine removal of excisable goods without paying Central Excise duty. The manager's involvement was established, justifying the penalties despite arguments against penalty imposition due to duty payment before notice and based on a precedent. The provisional release of goods with fines in lieu of confiscation was upheld to maintain procedural integrity, leading to the rejection of the appeals and affirmation of the original order. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=932