<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 763 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174941</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision disallowing Cenvat credit on goods like plates and angles, based on limitation and merit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as the Commissioner found no intent to evade duty and that the extended period should not apply due to a bona fide doubt on eligibility for the credit. The case outcome favored the respondent based on limitation grounds without delving into the merits of the issue of goods&#039; classification as capital goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:04:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 763 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174941</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision disallowing Cenvat credit on goods like plates and angles, based on limitation and merit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as the Commissioner found no intent to evade duty and that the extended period should not apply due to a bona fide doubt on eligibility for the credit. The case outcome favored the respondent based on limitation grounds without delving into the merits of the issue of goods&#039; classification as capital goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>