<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 493 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174933</link>
    <description>In an appeal by one party, a respondent who has not filed a cross-appeal or cross-objection may support the decree to the extent it is favourable and may challenge adverse findings, but cannot obtain an enlarged relief adverse to the appellant. Order 41 Rule 33 CPC is discretionary and may be used to do complete justice or avoid inconsistent decrees, but not to revive a relief that has become final or to grant a separate severable relief that was not independently challenged. Where the decree granted only conditional specific performance, the respondent could not secure an absolute decree for specific performance in the appellant&#039;s appeal without filing a cross-appeal or cross-objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 493 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174933</link>
      <description>In an appeal by one party, a respondent who has not filed a cross-appeal or cross-objection may support the decree to the extent it is favourable and may challenge adverse findings, but cannot obtain an enlarged relief adverse to the appellant. Order 41 Rule 33 CPC is discretionary and may be used to do complete justice or avoid inconsistent decrees, but not to revive a relief that has become final or to grant a separate severable relief that was not independently challenged. Where the decree granted only conditional specific performance, the respondent could not secure an absolute decree for specific performance in the appellant&#039;s appeal without filing a cross-appeal or cross-objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>