<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1000 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174930</link>
    <description>The Court declined to interfere with the show cause notice challenged under FEMA but directed the respondents to consider the petitioners&#039; objection on the provision&#039;s applicability and issue appropriate orders within four weeks. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs awarded, emphasizing that challenges to show cause notices should only be entertained in cases of clear lack of jurisdiction or legal basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:31:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1000 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174930</link>
      <description>The Court declined to interfere with the show cause notice challenged under FEMA but directed the respondents to consider the petitioners&#039; objection on the provision&#039;s applicability and issue appropriate orders within four weeks. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs awarded, emphasizing that challenges to show cause notices should only be entertained in cases of clear lack of jurisdiction or legal basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>