<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 62 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=925</link>
    <description>Software imported on CDs and floppy disks remained software for tariff classification purposes and was not to be treated as parts of a remote access server system; the exemption under Notification No. 20/99-Cus. was therefore available. The Tribunal also held that the demand could not stand because the adjudication relied on an undisclosed third-party clarification and the assessee was not given a proper opportunity to rebut it, amounting to a breach of natural justice. The absence of a proper show cause notice further vitiated the demand. The appeal succeeded and the duty demand and exemption denial were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 62 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=925</link>
      <description>Software imported on CDs and floppy disks remained software for tariff classification purposes and was not to be treated as parts of a remote access server system; the exemption under Notification No. 20/99-Cus. was therefore available. The Tribunal also held that the demand could not stand because the adjudication relied on an undisclosed third-party clarification and the assessee was not given a proper opportunity to rebut it, amounting to a breach of natural justice. The absence of a proper show cause notice further vitiated the demand. The appeal succeeded and the duty demand and exemption denial were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>