<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267065</link>
    <description>Denial of Cenvat credit required fresh verification where the appellant asserted supporting documents for the claim. The adjudicating authority had noted that the documents relied on for credit were not produced, so the credit entitlement could not be finally decided on the existing record. The matter was therefore remanded for examination of the relevant records, determination of the admissible Cenvat credit, and recomputation of any surviving demand after such verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:15:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267065</link>
      <description>Denial of Cenvat credit required fresh verification where the appellant asserted supporting documents for the claim. The adjudicating authority had noted that the documents relied on for credit were not produced, so the credit entitlement could not be finally decided on the existing record. The matter was therefore remanded for examination of the relevant records, determination of the admissible Cenvat credit, and recomputation of any surviving demand after such verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>