<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2338 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267064</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI held that the cost of transportation from the factory to depot is not to be included in the value of goods for the period of April 2002 to March 2003. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal relying on a prior order upheld by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:15:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2338 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267064</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI held that the cost of transportation from the factory to depot is not to be included in the value of goods for the period of April 2002 to March 2003. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal relying on a prior order upheld by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>