https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267060 Repeated non-compliance with Tribunal directions to make the required pre-deposit of balance CENVAT credit and to report compliance led to dismissal of the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal had earlier granted extended time and considered modification requests, but no compliance was reported on the final date fixed and no appearance was made for the appellant. In these circumstances, the appeal was not allowed to proceed and was dismissed for failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement. en-us Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267060 Repeated non-compliance with Tribunal directions to make the required pre-deposit of balance CENVAT credit and to report compliance led to dismissal of the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal had earlier granted extended time and considered modification requests, but no compliance was reported on the final date fixed and no appearance was made for the appellant. In these circumstances, the appeal was not allowed to proceed and was dismissed for failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267060