<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267058</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Tribunal was confirmed. The court found that the principles of natural justice were not violated and that the Commissioner of Customs was justified in invoking Regulation 11(2) of HCCAR, 2009 due to the appellant&#039;s repeated violations and the necessity for immediate action. The court directed the Commissioner of Customs to complete the investigation and take appropriate action under HCCAR, 2009, within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267058</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Tribunal was confirmed. The court found that the principles of natural justice were not violated and that the Commissioner of Customs was justified in invoking Regulation 11(2) of HCCAR, 2009 due to the appellant&#039;s repeated violations and the necessity for immediate action. The court directed the Commissioner of Customs to complete the investigation and take appropriate action under HCCAR, 2009, within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>