<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2326 - COMPANY LAW BOARD CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267052</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition as the petitioners lacked locus standi, having ceased to be shareholders and directors long ago. They failed to prove continuous acts of oppression or mismanagement and were found to have filed the petition with ulterior motives. Consequently, the court denied all reliefs sought by the petitioners, emphasizing the need to come with clean hands in equity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:13:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2326 - COMPANY LAW BOARD CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267052</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition as the petitioners lacked locus standi, having ceased to be shareholders and directors long ago. They failed to prove continuous acts of oppression or mismanagement and were found to have filed the petition with ulterior motives. Consequently, the court denied all reliefs sought by the petitioners, emphasizing the need to come with clean hands in equity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>