https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267051 The Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, a pharmaceutical manufacturer, in a case concerning compliance with Rule 6(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Despite not maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted final products, the appellant's compliance with the retrospective amendment to Rule 6(3) by Finance Act, 2010 was deemed sufficient. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order, ruling that the demand under Rule 6(3)(b) was invalid, and allowed the appeal. en-us Wed, 06 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267051 The Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, a pharmaceutical manufacturer, in a case concerning compliance with Rule 6(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Despite not maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted final products, the appellant's compliance with the retrospective amendment to Rule 6(3) by Finance Act, 2010 was deemed sufficient. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order, ruling that the demand under Rule 6(3)(b) was invalid, and allowed the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267051