<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2324 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the assessable value determination based on art work and plate making charges. The Tribunal found no evidence indicating the use of art work/plates in manufacturing laminated tubes, leading to the exclusion of their value from the assessable value. The appellant&#039;s argument that these items were not used in manufacturing excisable goods and were recovered through debit notes was accepted, highlighting the lack of investigation by revenue into the appellant&#039;s explanation and the consistent stance maintained by the appellant throughout the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2324 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the assessable value determination based on art work and plate making charges. The Tribunal found no evidence indicating the use of art work/plates in manufacturing laminated tubes, leading to the exclusion of their value from the assessable value. The appellant&#039;s argument that these items were not used in manufacturing excisable goods and were recovered through debit notes was accepted, highlighting the lack of investigation by revenue into the appellant&#039;s explanation and the consistent stance maintained by the appellant throughout the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>