https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267049 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI refused to admit an appeal under the Second proviso to Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the amount involved was below the prescribed threshold limit of &8377; 50,000. The Tribunal's decision emphasized the importance of financial thresholds in determining its jurisdiction, highlighting its discretion to refuse appeals based on the financial implications involved in the case. en-us Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:10:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267049 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI refused to admit an appeal under the Second proviso to Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the amount involved was below the prescribed threshold limit of &8377; 50,000. The Tribunal's decision emphasized the importance of financial thresholds in determining its jurisdiction, highlighting its discretion to refuse appeals based on the financial implications involved in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267049