https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267048 The judgment by Ms. Archana Wadhwa set aside the demand confirmation of Rs. 1,94,771 and penalty imposition against the appellant. The decision was based on insufficient evidence linking the appellant to the alleged irregularities in the supply chain, in line with a previous tribunal ruling that overturned a similar demand confirmation. The appeal was allowed after considering the investigations, discrepancies in the supply chain, and relevant legal precedents, ensuring a fair outcome based on the available evidence and legal principles. en-us Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:10:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267048 The judgment by Ms. Archana Wadhwa set aside the demand confirmation of Rs. 1,94,771 and penalty imposition against the appellant. The decision was based on insufficient evidence linking the appellant to the alleged irregularities in the supply chain, in line with a previous tribunal ruling that overturned a similar demand confirmation. The appeal was allowed after considering the investigations, discrepancies in the supply chain, and relevant legal precedents, ensuring a fair outcome based on the available evidence and legal principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267048