<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2318 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on the genuineness of the steel purchase transaction, the validity of depreciation claims, and the allowability of interest expenses for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence to challenge the transactions, leading to a judgment in favor of the assessee on January 23, 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:08:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2318 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on the genuineness of the steel purchase transaction, the validity of depreciation claims, and the allowability of interest expenses for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence to challenge the transactions, leading to a judgment in favor of the assessee on January 23, 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>