<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2299 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, holding that the assessee had proven the genuineness of the purchase and sale of shares. The Tribunal found no basis to doubt the transactions as sham or bogus, given the shares were held in the Demat account since 2003 and the transactions were reflected in the balance sheet. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 48,59,131/- as income from undisclosed sources was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:07:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2299 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, holding that the assessee had proven the genuineness of the purchase and sale of shares. The Tribunal found no basis to doubt the transactions as sham or bogus, given the shares were held in the Demat account since 2003 and the transactions were reflected in the balance sheet. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 48,59,131/- as income from undisclosed sources was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>