<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 740 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174923</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ordered that related cases should be heard together to resolve individual disputes. Counsels involved were Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha for the Petitioner and Mr. Sunil Gupta, Mr. Gopal Prasad, and Mr. Pratap Kalra for the Respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 22:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 740 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174923</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ordered that related cases should be heard together to resolve individual disputes. Counsels involved were Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha for the Petitioner and Mr. Sunil Gupta, Mr. Gopal Prasad, and Mr. Pratap Kalra for the Respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>