https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174918 Section 5 of the Limitation Act applied to an application for special leave to appeal under Section 417(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure because Section 417 did not expressly exclude the Limitation Act and was not a self-contained code on limitation or exclusion of time. The Court held that exclusion under Section 29(2) must be by clear words, not implication, and that the new Limitation Act therefore governed the special-law limitation period. On the uncontroverted affidavit, sufficient cause for the delay was shown, so the delay in filing the special leave application was rightly condoned. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:46:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174918 Section 5 of the Limitation Act applied to an application for special leave to appeal under Section 417(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure because Section 417 did not expressly exclude the Limitation Act and was not a self-contained code on limitation or exclusion of time. The Court held that exclusion under Section 29(2) must be by clear words, not implication, and that the new Limitation Act therefore governed the special-law limitation period. On the uncontroverted affidavit, sufficient cause for the delay was shown, so the delay in filing the special leave application was rightly condoned. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174918