<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 929 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174909</link>
    <description>The Special Court Act permits a Custodian to notify a person on subjective satisfaction based on reliable material and reports, without a pre-notification hearing, because the post-notification challenge under Section 4(2) satisfies natural justice. The expression &quot;involved in any offence relating to transactions in securities&quot; was read broadly to cover persons with a nexus to the securities scam, not only formally accused persons, and complaint material from Canfina and other sources could be acted upon. Properties of a notified person remained liable to attachment and maintenance for realization of dues, but interest and penal charges on maintenance arrears were disallowed on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 929 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174909</link>
      <description>The Special Court Act permits a Custodian to notify a person on subjective satisfaction based on reliable material and reports, without a pre-notification hearing, because the post-notification challenge under Section 4(2) satisfies natural justice. The expression &quot;involved in any offence relating to transactions in securities&quot; was read broadly to cover persons with a nexus to the securities scam, not only formally accused persons, and complaint material from Canfina and other sources could be acted upon. Properties of a notified person remained liable to attachment and maintenance for realization of dues, but interest and penal charges on maintenance arrears were disallowed on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>