<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 19 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=915</link>
    <description>The case involved issues of misuse of Import-Export Passbook, liability to customs duty on consignments of dyes, confiscation of dyes, imposition of penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The duty demand on 9 consignments was upheld, penalties were reduced, and duty demand/confiscation on 5 provisionally released consignments was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 19 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=915</link>
      <description>The case involved issues of misuse of Import-Export Passbook, liability to customs duty on consignments of dyes, confiscation of dyes, imposition of penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The duty demand on 9 consignments was upheld, penalties were reduced, and duty demand/confiscation on 5 provisionally released consignments was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>