<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 794 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174905</link>
    <description>Interim stay was extended because the appeal had not yet been heard by the Tribunal. The earlier stay order was continued for six months, or until final disposal of the appeal, whichever occurred earlier. The order preserves the existing protection pending adjudication and does not decide the substantive central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 794 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174905</link>
      <description>Interim stay was extended because the appeal had not yet been heard by the Tribunal. The earlier stay order was continued for six months, or until final disposal of the appeal, whichever occurred earlier. The order preserves the existing protection pending adjudication and does not decide the substantive central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>