<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2284 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267010</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the demand for ineligible CENVAT Credit on services used in a residential colony by the appellant, following established legal principles and a precedent from the High Court of Bombay. The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on the appellant based on consistency with a previous decision and legal standards. The judgment emphasized the importance of aligning with existing legal interpretations and precedents, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal standards in matters of indirect taxation and credit availment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:36:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2284 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267010</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the demand for ineligible CENVAT Credit on services used in a residential colony by the appellant, following established legal principles and a precedent from the High Court of Bombay. The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on the appellant based on consistency with a previous decision and legal standards. The judgment emphasized the importance of aligning with existing legal interpretations and precedents, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal standards in matters of indirect taxation and credit availment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>