https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267007 The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in the case involving M/s. Brimco Plastic Machinery Pvt. Ltd. The Court held that installation charges for equipment at customer premises should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty purposes. Referencing relevant legal precedents, the Court emphasized that expenses incurred post-clearance, such as installation costs, should not impact the assessable value. The appeal was dismissed, underscoring the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and established legal principles in determining the assessable value of goods. en-us Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jan 2016 10:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267007 The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in the case involving M/s. Brimco Plastic Machinery Pvt. Ltd. The Court held that installation charges for equipment at customer premises should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty purposes. Referencing relevant legal precedents, the Court emphasized that expenses incurred post-clearance, such as installation costs, should not impact the assessable value. The appeal was dismissed, underscoring the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and established legal principles in determining the assessable value of goods. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267007