<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2272 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266998</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in a case concerning the application of Rule 11 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It was held that the rule does not apply when some final products are exempted while others remain dutiable, permitting the utilization of CENVAT credit for dutiable products. The decision emphasized the distinction between exempted and dutiable final products and aligned with previous authoritative judicial pronouncements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2272 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266998</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in a case concerning the application of Rule 11 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It was held that the rule does not apply when some final products are exempted while others remain dutiable, permitting the utilization of CENVAT credit for dutiable products. The decision emphasized the distinction between exempted and dutiable final products and aligned with previous authoritative judicial pronouncements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>