<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2257 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266983</link>
    <description>The court held that the Company Law Board (CLB) lost jurisdiction once it disposed of the company petition, becoming functus officio. The doctrine of merger applied, making the High Court&#039;s appellate order the operative order. The valuation by the statutory auditor was deemed correct. Consequently, the CLB&#039;s order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:33:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2257 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266983</link>
      <description>The court held that the Company Law Board (CLB) lost jurisdiction once it disposed of the company petition, becoming functus officio. The doctrine of merger applied, making the High Court&#039;s appellate order the operative order. The valuation by the statutory auditor was deemed correct. Consequently, the CLB&#039;s order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>