<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2256 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266982</link>
    <description>The appeals in the case were allowed for statistical purposes regarding the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed concerning the disallowance under section 35(2AB) and section 37(1), directing the Assessing Officer to treat the expenses as revenue expenditure. The issue of software expenses was remanded back to the CIT(A) for re-examination, allowing the Assessee to submit additional evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2256 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266982</link>
      <description>The appeals in the case were allowed for statistical purposes regarding the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act. The Assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed concerning the disallowance under section 35(2AB) and section 37(1), directing the Assessing Officer to treat the expenses as revenue expenditure. The issue of software expenses was remanded back to the CIT(A) for re-examination, allowing the Assessee to submit additional evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>