<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2244 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266970</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Department was dismissed, and the deletions made by the CIT(A) regarding the rejection of books of account and various disallowances were upheld by the court. The court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions were unsupported and lacked proper reasoning, leading to the rejection of the additions made on account of various expenses. The court confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:32:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2244 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266970</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Department was dismissed, and the deletions made by the CIT(A) regarding the rejection of books of account and various disallowances were upheld by the court. The court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions were unsupported and lacked proper reasoning, leading to the rejection of the additions made on account of various expenses. The court confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>