<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2239 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of expenditure under VSS, as the scheme was deemed compulsory, making the deduction applicable under section 35DDA. The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, as the disallowance was overturned, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2239 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of expenditure under VSS, as the scheme was deemed compulsory, making the deduction applicable under section 35DDA. The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, as the disallowance was overturned, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>