<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 460 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174886</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) on the gifts received by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee had complied with the conditions of Explanation 5 by admitting the non-genuine nature of the gifts, filing revised returns, and paying the taxes. However, the penalty on the commission paid for arranging the gifts was confirmed as Explanation 5 did not cover such expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:25:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 460 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174886</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) on the gifts received by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee had complied with the conditions of Explanation 5 by admitting the non-genuine nature of the gifts, filing revised returns, and paying the taxes. However, the penalty on the commission paid for arranging the gifts was confirmed as Explanation 5 did not cover such expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>