<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 50 - Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=901</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the order confirming demands on bought out items like nuts and bolts used in tower erection. Citing relevant judgments, the Tribunal held that duty cannot be levied on bought out items when duty-paid goods are removed to the site with bought out finished goods. The impugned order was deemed incorrect, leading to the appeal being allowed with necessary relief granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 50 - Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=901</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the order confirming demands on bought out items like nuts and bolts used in tower erection. Citing relevant judgments, the Tribunal held that duty cannot be levied on bought out items when duty-paid goods are removed to the site with bought out finished goods. The impugned order was deemed incorrect, leading to the appeal being allowed with necessary relief granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>