https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266954 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. It held that disallowance of Cenvat credit on medical insurance services was unjustified as the services qualified as input services. Additionally, it found the demand for interest on delayed service tax payment prior to 10.5.2008 unsustainable, emphasizing the significance of legal provisions and case law in determining credit eligibility and liabilities accurately. en-us Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266954 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. It held that disallowance of Cenvat credit on medical insurance services was unjustified as the services qualified as input services. Additionally, it found the demand for interest on delayed service tax payment prior to 10.5.2008 unsustainable, emphasizing the significance of legal provisions and case law in determining credit eligibility and liabilities accurately. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266954