<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2221 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266947</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that services provided to Foreign Institutional Clients (FIIs) outside India from May 2006 to February 2007 should be classified as &#039;export of services,&#039; allowing the rebate claim. Orders were set aside for this period. For services in March 2007, the matter was remanded for verification of payment in convertible foreign exchange. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2221 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266947</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that services provided to Foreign Institutional Clients (FIIs) outside India from May 2006 to February 2007 should be classified as &#039;export of services,&#039; allowing the rebate claim. Orders were set aside for this period. For services in March 2007, the matter was remanded for verification of payment in convertible foreign exchange. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>