<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2216 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266942</link>
    <description>Amounts retained by a warehouse keeper after auctioning unclaimed imported consignments, once lawful dues and expenses are adjusted, were treated as a deposit pending claim by the importer rather than consideration for storage and warehousing services. Following Circular No. 11/1/2002-TRU and earlier materially similar decisions, the Tribunal held that no service tax arose on the balance retained amount merely because it remained with the assessee and was shown as interim income. The demand was therefore set aside, confirming that such retained balances are not taxable as service consideration on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2216 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266942</link>
      <description>Amounts retained by a warehouse keeper after auctioning unclaimed imported consignments, once lawful dues and expenses are adjusted, were treated as a deposit pending claim by the importer rather than consideration for storage and warehousing services. Following Circular No. 11/1/2002-TRU and earlier materially similar decisions, the Tribunal held that no service tax arose on the balance retained amount merely because it remained with the assessee and was shown as interim income. The demand was therefore set aside, confirming that such retained balances are not taxable as service consideration on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>