<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2214 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266940</link>
    <description>Transportation of employees was examined for possible classification as Tour Operator Service under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal held that where the statute defines the expression, reliance on a dictionary meaning of &quot;tour&quot; was unnecessary, and the relevant statutory definitions had to be applied. It also noted that no finding had been recorded on whether the vehicle used to carry employees satisfied the criteria under the Motor Vehicles Act and the Central Motor Vehicles Rules. As the issue had not been considered on the correct legal basis, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for de novo adjudication and a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2214 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266940</link>
      <description>Transportation of employees was examined for possible classification as Tour Operator Service under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal held that where the statute defines the expression, reliance on a dictionary meaning of &quot;tour&quot; was unnecessary, and the relevant statutory definitions had to be applied. It also noted that no finding had been recorded on whether the vehicle used to carry employees satisfied the criteria under the Motor Vehicles Act and the Central Motor Vehicles Rules. As the issue had not been considered on the correct legal basis, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for de novo adjudication and a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>