<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2206 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266932</link>
    <description>Remission of duty was held admissible under Rule 21 for loss of molasses where the storage tank nipple ruptured and the loss was undisputedly accidental. The deciding factor was that the rupture arose from leakage in an old storage tank, the loss was immediately reported, and there was no deliberate act or mala fide conduct by the assessee. The rule on remission was applied to accidental destruction or loss not caused intentionally, and duty remission was therefore allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2206 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266932</link>
      <description>Remission of duty was held admissible under Rule 21 for loss of molasses where the storage tank nipple ruptured and the loss was undisputedly accidental. The deciding factor was that the rupture arose from leakage in an old storage tank, the loss was immediately reported, and there was no deliberate act or mala fide conduct by the assessee. The rule on remission was applied to accidental destruction or loss not caused intentionally, and duty remission was therefore allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>