<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2205 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266931</link>
    <description>Where allowable deemed credit exceeded the duty liability and the record showed excess duty payment, no interest was payable on the alleged shortfall. The penalty was also unsustainable because the record did not establish mens rea or mala fides. On that basis, the demand for interest and penalty could not be maintained, and relief followed for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2205 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266931</link>
      <description>Where allowable deemed credit exceeded the duty liability and the record showed excess duty payment, no interest was payable on the alleged shortfall. The penalty was also unsustainable because the record did not establish mens rea or mala fides. On that basis, the demand for interest and penalty could not be maintained, and relief followed for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>