https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266921 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant concerning the alleged clandestine removal of finished goods due to lack of sufficient evidence. Emphasizing the importance of verification and corroborative evidence, the Tribunal highlighted that a case of clandestine removal cannot solely rely on confessional statements. The judgment did not extensively address the second issue related to the refund claim, disposing of it without detailed analysis as the primary focus was on the clandestine removal issue. en-us Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:31:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266921 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant concerning the alleged clandestine removal of finished goods due to lack of sufficient evidence. Emphasizing the importance of verification and corroborative evidence, the Tribunal highlighted that a case of clandestine removal cannot solely rely on confessional statements. The judgment did not extensively address the second issue related to the refund claim, disposing of it without detailed analysis as the primary focus was on the clandestine removal issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266921