https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266917 The Court upheld the validity of deficiency letters issued to the Petitioner, ruling that as a foreign brand, they were not entitled to benefits under the "Served From India Scheme" (SFIS) as per the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14. The judgment emphasized the policy objective of promoting Indian brands and service providers, dismissing the Petitioner's claims for Duty Credit Scrips and affirming the Respondents' authority in interpreting and amending the FTP 2009-14 provisions. The Court denied the Writ Petition, leaving each party to bear their own costs. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266917 The Court upheld the validity of deficiency letters issued to the Petitioner, ruling that as a foreign brand, they were not entitled to benefits under the "Served From India Scheme" (SFIS) as per the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14. The judgment emphasized the policy objective of promoting Indian brands and service providers, dismissing the Petitioner's claims for Duty Credit Scrips and affirming the Respondents' authority in interpreting and amending the FTP 2009-14 provisions. The Court denied the Writ Petition, leaving each party to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266917