<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2190 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266916</link>
    <description>Recovery of licensed COLDSET tablets from the petitioner&#039;s unit was treated as insufficient by itself to show illegality, because the competent authority had permitted manufacture and marketing and the sampled composition matched permitted components. The alleged fake invoices and supplies to non-existent firms were not considered adequately verified on the material then available, and the court observed that if the supplies were genuine, the stricter Section 37 NDPS Act bar would not automatically apply. A fresh fact-finding exercise from the concerned authorities in Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand was directed before bail was reconsidered, with release to follow if two views remained possible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:31:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2190 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266916</link>
      <description>Recovery of licensed COLDSET tablets from the petitioner&#039;s unit was treated as insufficient by itself to show illegality, because the competent authority had permitted manufacture and marketing and the sampled composition matched permitted components. The alleged fake invoices and supplies to non-existent firms were not considered adequately verified on the material then available, and the court observed that if the supplies were genuine, the stricter Section 37 NDPS Act bar would not automatically apply. A fresh fact-finding exercise from the concerned authorities in Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand was directed before bail was reconsidered, with release to follow if two views remained possible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>