<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2164 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, holding that the penalty proceedings were invalid due to the defective notice under Section 274, which failed to specify the grounds for penalty. The penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was consequently canceled, emphasizing the necessity for clear and specific notices in penalty proceedings to uphold the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2164 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, holding that the penalty proceedings were invalid due to the defective notice under Section 274, which failed to specify the grounds for penalty. The penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was consequently canceled, emphasizing the necessity for clear and specific notices in penalty proceedings to uphold the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>