https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174871 Writ relief under Article 226 is ordinarily inappropriate for enforcing a life insurance claim where repudiation gives rise to disputed facts and the dispute requires evidence; in such cases, the claimant should be driven to a civil suit. Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938 permits repudiation of a life policy only if the insurer proves that the statement related to a material matter, that the suppression was fraudulent, and that the policy-holder knew the statement was false or knowingly suppressed the fact. Mere inaccuracy or suspicion is insufficient. On that basis, repudiation is valid only when all statutory conditions are established. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174871 Writ relief under Article 226 is ordinarily inappropriate for enforcing a life insurance claim where repudiation gives rise to disputed facts and the dispute requires evidence; in such cases, the claimant should be driven to a civil suit. Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938 permits repudiation of a life policy only if the insurer proves that the statement related to a material matter, that the suppression was fraudulent, and that the policy-holder knew the statement was false or knowingly suppressed the fact. Mere inaccuracy or suspicion is insufficient. On that basis, repudiation is valid only when all statutory conditions are established. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174871