<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 643 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174858</link>
    <description>Contempt proceedings are not warranted where an employer terminates services after notice and in purported compliance with an earlier court direction, especially while a separate writ challenge to the termination remains pending. The text also explains that compassionate appointment is a limited exception to equality in public employment and is valid only within the governing scheme and for eligible dependants. An appointment made outside the scheme, by a person not covered as a dependent beneficiary and long after the employee&#039;s death, is treated as without authority and a nullity, so its cancellation cannot support contempt action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 643 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174858</link>
      <description>Contempt proceedings are not warranted where an employer terminates services after notice and in purported compliance with an earlier court direction, especially while a separate writ challenge to the termination remains pending. The text also explains that compassionate appointment is a limited exception to equality in public employment and is valid only within the governing scheme and for eligible dependants. An appointment made outside the scheme, by a person not covered as a dependent beneficiary and long after the employee&#039;s death, is treated as without authority and a nullity, so its cancellation cannot support contempt action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>