<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2145 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266871</link>
    <description>The High Court emphasized the importance of compliance with court orders, stating that failure to comply can lead to imposition of costs. In this case, an officer faced personal costs for non-compliance with a court direction. The court granted an extension but imposed costs on the respondents. The court stressed the need for timely compliance with orders and accountability of officials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2145 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266871</link>
      <description>The High Court emphasized the importance of compliance with court orders, stating that failure to comply can lead to imposition of costs. In this case, an officer faced personal costs for non-compliance with a court direction. The court granted an extension but imposed costs on the respondents. The court stressed the need for timely compliance with orders and accountability of officials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>