https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266869 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of multiple appellants challenging penalties imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002/2004. Penalties were set aside or reduced for most appellants due to insufficient evidence demonstrating their knowledge of liability to confiscation. The Tribunal found that in many cases, there was no evidence indicating such knowledge, leading to the penalties being overturned or lessened. en-us Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266869 The Tribunal allowed the appeals of multiple appellants challenging penalties imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002/2004. Penalties were set aside or reduced for most appellants due to insufficient evidence demonstrating their knowledge of liability to confiscation. The Tribunal found that in many cases, there was no evidence indicating such knowledge, leading to the penalties being overturned or lessened. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266869