<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 42 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in the case of Markfed Vanaspati &amp;amp; Allied Industries. It concluded that the waste oil drained from the DG set does not fall under the dutiable classification as argued by the revenue, ruling in favor of the respondent based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 42 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in the case of Markfed Vanaspati &amp;amp; Allied Industries. It concluded that the waste oil drained from the DG set does not fall under the dutiable classification as argued by the revenue, ruling in favor of the respondent based on established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>