<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2131 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266857</link>
    <description>The court held that the customs cargo service provider was not allowed to impose demurrage charges for the period of detention by customs authorities. The petitioner could clear the goods without demurrage until 15th January 2015, after which any demurrage charges were the petitioner&#039;s responsibility. The writ petition was resolved with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2131 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266857</link>
      <description>The court held that the customs cargo service provider was not allowed to impose demurrage charges for the period of detention by customs authorities. The petitioner could clear the goods without demurrage until 15th January 2015, after which any demurrage charges were the petitioner&#039;s responsibility. The writ petition was resolved with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>