<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2121 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266847</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, with Ground No. 2 being partly allowed in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of interest under Section 36 of the Income Tax Act. However, Ground No. 3, concerning the claim of depreciation on the stock exchange card post-demutualization, was decided against the assessee. The order was pronounced on 27.05.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2121 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266847</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, with Ground No. 2 being partly allowed in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of interest under Section 36 of the Income Tax Act. However, Ground No. 3, concerning the claim of depreciation on the stock exchange card post-demutualization, was decided against the assessee. The order was pronounced on 27.05.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>