<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2110 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266836</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, affirming the eligibility of the company in SEZ for deduction under Section 10B and rejecting the disallowance of expenditure on earth development expenses. The judgment highlighted the importance of consistency and adherence to legal provisions in determining tax liabilities and deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2110 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266836</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, affirming the eligibility of the company in SEZ for deduction under Section 10B and rejecting the disallowance of expenditure on earth development expenses. The judgment highlighted the importance of consistency and adherence to legal provisions in determining tax liabilities and deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>