<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1196 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the disallowance of lease rentals as revenue expenditure for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized that each year is independent in income tax proceedings, and the excessive lease rentals indicated a hire purchase arrangement. The decision highlighted that the sister concern&#039;s treatment of lease rentals as income did not justify their allowance as expenses for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1196 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the disallowance of lease rentals as revenue expenditure for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized that each year is independent in income tax proceedings, and the excessive lease rentals indicated a hire purchase arrangement. The decision highlighted that the sister concern&#039;s treatment of lease rentals as income did not justify their allowance as expenses for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>